Organ donor là gì

  -  

Around the world, organ donation policies vary greatly. Is it best to have sầu a donation system where people have sầu to lớn opt in or opt out? To investigate, a team of researchers from the UK have analyzed the organ donation protocols of 48 countries to lớn see which approach is working best.


*
Share on PinterestIn the US, a new patient is added lớn the waiting danh sách for an organ transplant every 10 minutes.

Bạn đang xem: Organ donor là gì


With an opt-in system, people have lớn actively sign up to a register lớn donate their organs after death. In opt-out systems, organ donation will occur automatically unless a specific request is made before death for organs not to lớn be taken.

Prof. Eamonn Ferguson, lead author from the University of Nottingyêu thích, UK, acknowledges that because the two systems are reliant on an active decision from individuals, it can lead khổng lồ drawbacks:

“People may not act for numerous reasons, including loss aversion, effort, và believing that the policy makers have sầu made the ‘right’ decision & one that they believe sầu in.”

However, inaction in an opt-in system can lead to lớn individuals who would want to lớn be a donor not donating (a false negative). In contrast, inaction in an opt-out system can potentially lead to an individual that does not want to donate becoming a donor (a false positive).

Xem thêm: Crescent Là Gì Trong Tiếng Việt? Crescent Là Gì, Nghĩa Của Từ Crescent

The US currently uses an opt-in system. According to the US Department of Health và Human Services, 28,000 transplants were made possible last year due lớn organ donors. Around 79 people receive organ transplants every day. Unfortunately, around 18 people die every day, unable khổng lồ have surgery due to a shortage of donated organs.


Researchers from the University of Nottingsi, University of Stirling and Northumbria University in the UK analyzed the organ donation systems of 48 countries for a period of 13 years – 23 using an opt-in system và 25 using an opt-out system.

The study authors measured overall donor numbers, numbers of transplant per organ and the total number of kidneys and livers transplanted from both deceased và living donors.

They found that countries using opt-out systems of organ donation had higher total numbers of kidneys donated – the organ that the majority of people on organ transplant lists are waiting for. Opt-out systems also had the greater overall number of organ transplants.

Xem thêm: Mê Mẩn Những Cánh Đồng Hoa Tam Giác Mạch Đẹp Không Kém Gì Hà Giang

Opt-in systems did, however, have sầu a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors. The apparent influence that policy had on living donation rates “has not been reported before,” says Prof. Ferguson, “and is a subtlety that needs lớn be highlighted và considered.”

The authors acknowledge that their study was limited by not distinguishing between different degrees of opt-out legislation, with some countries requiring permission from next-of-kin for organs to be donated. The observational nature of the study means that other factors that may influence organ donation remained unassessed.


The researchers state that their results, published in BMC Medicine, show that “opt-out consent may lead khổng lồ an increase in deceased donation but a reduction in living donation rates. Opt-out consent is also associated with an increase in the total number of livers and kidneys transplanted.”

They suggest that although the results could be used in the future to inform decisions on policy, they could be strengthened further through the routine collection of international organ donation information – consent type, procurement procedures & hospital bed availability, for example – which should then be made publicly available.

Prof. Ferguson suggests that future studies could also analyze the opinions of those who have sầu khổng lồ make the decision to lớn opt in or opt out:

”Further research outside of this country-màn chơi epidemiological approach would be to lớn examine issues from the perspective sầu of the individual in term of beliefs, wishes và attitudes, using a mixture of survey và experimental methods.”

“By combining these different retìm kiếm methods researchers can develop a greater understanding of the influence of consent legislation on organ donation và transplantation rates,” he says.

The authors note that countries using opt-out consent still experience organ donor shortages. Completely changing the system of consent is, therefore, unlikely lớn solve such a problem. They suggest that consent legislation or adopting aspects of the “Spanish Model” could be ways lớn improve donor rates.

Spain currently has the highest organ donation rate in the world. The Spanish utilize opt-out consent, but their success is credited by experts to measures such as a transplant co-ordination network that works both locally & nationally, và improving the quality of public information available about organ donation.

Recently, Medical News Today ran a spotlight feature on whether animal organs should be farmed for human transplants. Could this be a solution to lớn the organ shortage, or this a problem to lớn be addressed through changes lớn organ donation policy?